Personally, I completely disagree with the idea that it is a waste of money to protect them. Topic — Wild animals have no place in the 21st century…. They play an essential role on earth and we get together to share the world.
In fact it should be the most important global priority today. We can probably lose one or two or a dozen bricks and still have a standing house. For instance, people who have professional belongings are only favourable in 21st century.
There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim. Having said that, we waste millions of dollars on tobacco each day and I would say this is a waste of money.
In one hand, it can be argued that wild animals are becoming increasingly extinct in present decade. To what extent do Wild animals have no place agree or disagree? However, In my opinion, citizenries are facing more harsh condition in present Wild animals have no place than people in primitive years.
I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the humans and modernization means we need to be more selfish. It is merely provided as a sample. However, using mice to experiment new drugs is okay because it is contributing to saving human lives, which I believe is a priority.
In short, protecting all living creatures is essential, but humans take precedence over animals. On the other hand, the opponents may argue that it is not necessary to prevent the wild animals.
Also citizenries must develop a feeling of comradery, which will makes a life more safe and easy. For instance, chemical farming is required to meet the demand for cheaper food at any cost, and these practices are driven by greater demands for natural habitats such as woodland, forests and hills to be converted into farmlands.
There are very few mistakes in it. The human kind should maintain the balance of the ecosystem and invest money in protecting nature and wild creatures is rather a good investment.
Scientists have been awed by observing their behavior. Present a written argument or a case to an educated reader with no specialised knowledge of the following topic: In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
For example, if cats were to suddenly become extinct, there is a high probability that there will be a sudden increase in the number of bugs that cats feed on. Approximately words Model Answer 4: Personally, I am inclined to the view that we should give priority to protecting wild animals over any other things.
Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out.
Another, people, nowadays, have to pay a thick money to consume their basic needs. To keep the balance of the ecosystem, each species of the animal kingdom plays important roles and the existence of one species largely depends on upon another.
So depletion of green spaces ends up with decreased number of wild animals. Overall, this seems to be a band 8 essay.
We can probably lose one or two or a dozen bricks and still have a standing house. That said, I disagree with wasting excessive amount of resources to protect certain animals; human beings should always take priority.
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources. The recreational viewing of animals at zoos is also a source of revenue.
If they were extinct in the world, it would break the balance of the ecosystem. Every species of wildlife plays a role to maintain the balance of life on Earth. Establishment of more zoos, as well as protecting natural areas, should also be ensured by the government and the law enforcing authority.Topic – Wild animals have no place in the 21st century.
IELTS Writing Task 2 With Sample Answer.
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources. Hunting has been caused many species no longer exist and endangered.
For example, the last individual Asian one-horn rhino was found death in Nam Cat Tien, Vietnam. Furthermore, humans have been expanding their places for living, farming and other purposes. Living places for wild animals has become smaller than ever.
Protecting wild animals is a waste of resources | Band 8 essay samples.
by ielts practice · November 20, This essay was written by one of our students and may contain grammar and spelling mistakes. It is merely provided as a sample.
Topic “Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
( Words, 13 Sentences, 4 Paragraphs, Band 9). Nov 20, · Re: Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so prote Post by ashok4ielts» Fri Nov 07, pm Wild animals have no place in the.
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? đã hỏi 17 Tháng 11, trong Opinion bởi ntchung (0 điểm).Download